Sarawak DAP wants 20,180 postal voters in Sarawak who are mostly security personnel from Peninsular Malaysia to be barred from voting and deciding the future destiny of Sarawak.
“A fair election system should ensure that the fate of a country be determined by her own people.
“Similarly, the future destiny of Sarawak should be determined by those who are intimately connected to Sarawak and not by those who come from outside Sarawak state,” said State DAP Chairman Wong Ho Leng.
This is one of the recommendations submitted by DAP to the Parliamentary Select Committee which met in Kuching last week to seek views of various people including political parties with regard to electoral reform to be introduced by the government before the next general election.
Wong, who is the MP for Sibu said: “According to Parliament answer, as at 30th June 2011, there are 20,180 postal voters in Sarawak.
“We believe that the bulk of these are from the armed forces and police, and most of them are stationed in P.195 Bandar Kuching (2,142), P.196 Stampin (4,147), P.197 Kota Samarahan (4,259), P.212 Sibu (3,468) and P.219 Miri (1,359).
“Much that there is nothing in the Constitution to prohibit security personnel and police from Peninsula Malaysia who are posted to Sarawak to vote in Sarawak, DAP Sarawak feels that it ought to be a public policy that only those who have genuine connection with Sarawak be permitted to vote in Sarawak, whether Parliament or state elections.
“Connections can be by marriage and not by short term posting to Sarawak. These security personnel and police should vote by post in elections of their own state of origin,” he suggested.
On fair Representation by Sarawak/Sabah, Wong said that in accordance with the spirit of the Malaysia Agreement, 34% of parliamentary seats must be from Sarawak and Sabah but it has now been reduced to a mere 25%.
The voters of Sarawak and Sabah have thereby lost their rightful and proportionate representation in Parliament, he said.
“Instead of enhancing the spirit of the Malaysia Agreement, the present representation in the lower house of Parliament is skewed in favour of Peninsula Malaysia. This is because the Election Commission had re-delineated constituencies which reduced the representation by Sarawak and Sabah in Parliament.
“Before Sarawak and Sabah joined to form the Federation of Malaysia, it was clearly and carefully stated in the Cobbold Commission Report and the Malaysia Agreement that the number of parliamentary seats in Peninsula Malaysia must not be more than 2/3 of the total parliamentary seats.
“This is in order to ensure that Parliament shall not be able to amend the Constitution willy-nilly. In so doing, the special rights and safeguards of the Borneo states are protected.
“Any amendment thereof would require the support from the Borneo states. During those days, of the 155 Parliamentary seats, Peninsula Malaysia was allocated 104 seats, Singapore 15 seats, Sabah 16 seats and Sarawak 20 seats.
“Peninsula Malaysia had therefore 67% of the parliamentary seats. However, after re-delineation in 1974, Peninsula Malaysia had an additional 10 seats, while there was no increment for Sarawak and Sabah. With the withdrawal of Singapore from the Federation, Peninsula Malaysia is able to secure a two-third majority without the support of Sarawak and Sabah.
“The representation by Sarawak and Sabah has been further eroded recently when Peninsula Malaysia has 166 parliamentary seats. That represents 75% of the total 222 seats. With a total of 56 seats, Sarawak and Sabah has a mere 25% representation in Parliament,” he said.
Wong said the imbalance is unjustified because it violates the spirit of the Malaysia Agreement.
“It violates the sanctity of the federation that Sarawak and Sabah actually joined to form the Federation of Malaysia as equal partners.
“Further, the re-delineation by the Election Commission apparently failed to consider the geographical sizes of Peninsula Malaysia (166 seats for land size of 131,598 sq km), Sarawak (31 seats for land size of 124,450 sq km) and Sabah (25 seats for land size of 73,631 sq km).
“To rectify the imbalance, the Election Commission should reinstate the spirit of the Malaysia Agreement, and re-delineate and increase the Parliamentary seats for Sarawak and Sabah,” he said.
For Sarawak, the average population per constituency is around 30,000.00. However, pursuant to the electoral roll as at June 2011 there are five constituencies with less than 20,000 voters.
These are P200 Batang Sadong (17,898), P.203 Lubok Antu (18,334), P.206 Tanjong Manis (17,754), P.207 Igan (16,193), P.210 Kanowit (18,135), P.216 Hulu Rajang (19,900) and P.222 Lawas (17,217).
On the other hand, urban/semi urban centres show a concentration of voters. There are seven constituencies with voters exceeding 40,000.
These are P.194 Petra Jaya (44,741), P.195 Bandar Kuching (53,276), P.196 Stampin (76,494), P.211 Lanang (53,486), P.212 Sibu (60,284), P.217 Bintulu (54,821), P.219 Miri (62,147).
“Considering the geographical vastness of Sarawak, it is acceptable to give certain weightage to rural constituencies, but the larger urban/semi-urban constituencies do provide justification to increase Parliamentary seats.
“Such re-delineation will ensure that there is ‘fairer’ representation of urban/semi-urban folks in Parliament,” Wong said.
The DAP leader wanted the government of the day to be care-taker government as soon as Parliament or state assembly is dissolved, pointing out that there is no reason why a care-taker government is allowed to use public facilities such as government vehicles, town halls, Dewan Suarah to entice voters’ support.
“The care-taker Government should not be allowed to dangle development projects as election bait. No money or monetary gratification should be distributed in the name of it being a “caring Government” in order to enhance support during the campaign time.
“The Election Commission should ensure that such unhealthy political and electoral manoeuvring is stopped once Parliament or state assembly is dissolved,” he said.
He went to say that in order to gain public trust, the Election Commission should be truly independent and not beholden to any political party, especially the Government.
“No election officer or returning officer shall practice double standard. One example of double standard was recently practiced in Sibu.
“The same Returning Officer for the Sibu by-election had disallowed the winning DAP candidate from making a victory speech on 16th May 2010 but he allowed the BN/SUPP winning candidate of Bawang Assan to give a lengthy victory speech in the Sarawak state election of 16th April 2011.
“Such glaring double standard ought to be avoided,” he said.
Calling on returning and presiding officers to be properly trained, Wong said that many do not even know that counting agents are to be given tally sheets such as Borang 15 and Borang 16, duly signed by the Returning Officers or Presiding Officers and the counting agents of political parties.
“Even more scary have been cases of unlawful restraint of candidates at the nomination centres until the objection time has expired.
“The candidates for Pelawan were restrained by the Returning Officers during nomination in the 2006 and 2011 state elections. The candidate for Padungan in the 2011 Sarawak state election was similarly restrained and disallowed to leave the nomination centre until after the objection time had expired.
“When candidates were at the mercy of the Returning Officers or Presiding Officers, unless they were prepared to risk being disqualified, they had no choice but to stay behind, though unlawfully restrained or wrongfully imprisoned by the Election Commission,” he said.
The Election Commission should ensure that all officers involved in election be adequately trained from nomination process to voting and counting, he added.
3 comments:
Correct me if I am wrong,Datuk Seri Daneil Tajem lost to Donald Lawan in Bukit Begunan constituency because of postal votes from army personnels in Pakit Camp.
In civil service, the federal posts mean for Sarawak are filled by West Malaysians. A good example, the intake of Immigration Officers before.
That is how Malaya going to colonise Sarawak and Sabah.
Well done YB Ho Leng how can we allowed Orang Malaya to vote in Sarawak, what say other YBs especially from BN
May 2 questions be posed to the proposition that "destiny of Sarawak be determined by Sarawakians": (i) what if either PKR or DAP or both were to be elected in a Sarawak State Elections would not the issue of they both and their fitability by the fact of being Malaya based political parties comes to pass as well?; and (ii)is it not very obvious that this society has been built over by propaganda machines of BN, the economic manipulations, the divide and rule tactics,the electoral gerrymeandering, and the I-Lord-Over-Thou syndrome, since Independence by UMNO led Barisan to the extent the poor rural peoples, in particular, and the Sarawakians in general, have accepted it without asking that government leaders cannot be wrong is the truth and nothing can change that unless one would want a country without its government?
With that premise, and this can be compared with the Report by Lord Cobbold Commission on plesbecite before Malaysia came to be wherein a very large percentage of people (mostly of the rural based communities)who were interviewed for basis to the Report did not know what it was all about and preferred to leave it to the "government" to "decide" for them, it is a long time away before Sarawakians can determine its own destiny. For the immediate term at least PBB inspired agendas will still hold sway in Sarawak politics. Hence, for the most part of it our destiny will be determined by them unfortunately or fortunately depending on from which perspective one is looking at it..
Post a Comment